Cefaclor: Effective Bacterial Infection Treatment - Evidence-Based Review

Product dosage: 250mg
Package (num)Per pillPriceBuy
10$6.82$68.23 (0%)🛒 Add to cart
20$6.42$136.46 $128.43 (6%)🛒 Add to cart
30$6.32$204.69 $189.64 (7%)🛒 Add to cart
60$6.17$409.38 $370.24 (10%)🛒 Add to cart
90$6.02$614.06 $541.82 (12%)🛒 Add to cart
120$5.82$818.75 $698.35 (15%)🛒 Add to cart
180$5.62$1228.13 $1011.40 (18%)🛒 Add to cart
270$5.32$1842.19 $1435.82 (22%)🛒 Add to cart
360
$5.02 Best per pill
$2456.25 $1806.07 (26%)🛒 Add to cart
Product dosage: 500mg
Package (num)Per pillPriceBuy
10$12.74$127.43 (0%)🛒 Add to cart
20$12.39$254.86 $247.83 (3%)🛒 Add to cart
30$12.24$382.28 $367.23 (4%)🛒 Add to cart
60$12.04$764.57 $722.43 (6%)🛒 Add to cart
90$11.84$1146.85 $1065.58 (7%)🛒 Add to cart
120$11.44$1529.14 $1372.61 (10%)🛒 Add to cart
180$10.94$2293.70 $1968.61 (14%)🛒 Add to cart
270$10.54$3440.56 $2844.55 (17%)🛒 Add to cart
360
$10.03 Best per pill
$4587.41 $3612.13 (21%)🛒 Add to cart

Cefaclor is a second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic belonging to the beta-lactam class, structurally characterized by a chlorine atom at position 3 of its cephem nucleus, which enhances its stability against certain beta-lactamases compared to first-generation agents. It’s primarily administered orally as cefaclor monohydrate and exhibits bactericidal activity by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis through binding to penicillin-binding proteins. In clinical practice since the late 1970s, cefaclor has maintained relevance due to its spectrum covering common respiratory, urinary, and skin pathogens, though its use has evolved with growing resistance patterns and the introduction of newer agents. We initially saw it as just another cephalosporin, but its particular pharmacokinetic profile—moderate protein binding, good tissue penetration, and renal excretion—made it valuable for outpatient management of mild-to-moderate infections, especially in pediatric populations where palatability of suspensions mattered.

1. Introduction: What is Cefaclor? Its Role in Modern Medicine

Cefaclor represents an important milestone in antibiotic development, bridging the gap between narrow-spectrum penicillins and broader-spectrum third-generation cephalosporins. As a second-generation cephalosporin, cefaclor demonstrates improved activity against Gram-negative bacteria compared to first-generation agents while retaining appreciable coverage against many Gram-positive organisms. This balanced spectrum made cefaclor particularly valuable for treating community-acquired infections where the pathogen might not be definitively identified before initiating therapy.

In contemporary practice, cefaclor’s role has shifted somewhat due to escalating bacterial resistance, particularly among Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis producing beta-lactamases. However, it remains formulary in many institutions for specific indications where local susceptibility patterns support its use. The drug’s oral bioavailability and generally favorable side effect profile continue to make it a consideration for step-down therapy after initial intravenous treatment or for patients with penicillin hypersensitivity (excluding those with immediate-type reactions).

I remember when we first started using cefaclor in our community hospital in the early 90s—we were transitioning from ampicillin as first-line for otitis media because of rising resistance patterns. The pharmacy committee was divided; some physicians argued we were overspending on newer agents when amoxicillin still worked “well enough.” This tension between cost containment and evolving resistance would become a recurring theme in antimicrobial stewardship.

2. Key Components and Bioavailability of Cefaclor

Cefaclor is chemically designated as (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-2-amino-2-phenylacetamido]-3-chloro-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid. The critical structural component is the chlorine atom at position 3 of the cephem nucleus, which confers relative stability against certain plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, particularly those produced by Staphylococcus aureus and some Gram-negative bacteria.

The compound is typically formulated as cefaclor monohydrate for oral administration, available in several formats:

  • 250 mg and 500 mg capsules
  • 125 mg/5 mL, 187 mg/5 mL, 250 mg/5 mL, and 375 mg/5 mL suspensions
  • Extended-release tablets (500 mg)

Regarding cefaclor bioavailability, the drug is well-absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with peak serum concentrations occurring approximately 30-60 minutes after administration. The presence of food may slightly delay absorption but does not significantly reduce the overall extent of absorption—an important practical consideration for patient adherence. Unlike some cephalosporins, cefaclor absorption isn’t substantially affected by gastric pH, making concomitant administration with antacids or H2-receptor antagonists generally acceptable from a pharmacokinetic perspective.

Protein binding is relatively low at approximately 25%, meaning a higher proportion of circulating drug remains pharmacologically active. The volume of distribution is adequate for penetration into most tissues and body fluids, including middle ear effusions, bronchial secretions, and bone—though concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid are insufficient for treating meningitis.

3. Mechanism of Action of Cefaclor: Scientific Substantiation

Cefaclor exerts its bactericidal effect through inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis, a mechanism shared by all beta-lactam antibiotics. The process begins with cefaclor penetrating the bacterial cell wall, facilitated by the drug’s relatively small molecular size and hydrophilic properties. Once inside the periplasmic space, cefaclor binds preferentially to several penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) located on the cytoplasmic membrane.

These PBPs are transpeptidases, carboxypeptidases, and endopeptidases that catalyze the final stages of peptidoglycan cross-linking—the structural meshwork that provides bacterial cells with mechanical stability. When cefaclor binds to these enzymes, it competitively inhibits their transpeptidation activity, preventing the formation of cross-links between the linear peptidoglycan polymer chains. This disruption of cell wall synthesis activates bacterial autolysins while simultaneously compromising structural integrity, ultimately leading to osmotic lysis and cell death.

The chlorine substituent at position 3 of cefaclor’s dihydrothiazine ring provides steric hindrance against certain beta-lactamase enzymes, particularly the TEM-1 and SHV-1 plasmids commonly found in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This structural modification doesn’t make cefaclor beta-lactamase stable in the absolute sense—it remains susceptible to destruction by extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC enzymes—but does expand its utility against organisms that would inactivate earlier cephalosporins.

What we didn’t fully appreciate initially was how the bactericidal activity varied between different bacterial species. For some organisms, like streptococci, the killing was rapid and concentration-dependent. For others, particularly Gram-negatives with more complex cell wall structures, the effect was more time-dependent. This understanding would later inform dosing strategies, especially for more serious infections.

4. Indications for Use: What is Cefaclor Effective For?

Cefaclor for Respiratory Tract Infections

Cefaclor demonstrates efficacy against several common respiratory pathogens, making it appropriate for:

  • Acute otitis media caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae (including beta-lactamase-producing strains), and Moraxella catarrhalis
  • Pharyngitis and tonsillitis attributable to Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (as an alternative in penicillin-allergic patients)
  • Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
  • Community-acquired pneumonia of mild to moderate severity

The effectiveness in otitis media deserves particular mention—the drug achieves concentrations in middle ear fluid that exceed the MIC90 for susceptible pathogens for approximately 50% of the dosing interval when appropriate doses are administered.

Cefaclor for Urinary Tract Infections

While not first-line for complicated UTIs, cefaclor remains effective against many community-acquired urinary pathogens:

  • Uncomplicated cystitis caused by Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella species
  • Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy (when susceptible organisms are identified)

Renal excretion results in high urinary concentrations, typically 10-100 times serum levels, providing adequate coverage for lower urinary tract infections caused by susceptible organisms.

Cefaclor for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

The spectrum of cefaclor includes common skin pathogens:

  • Cellulitis, erysipelas, and impetigo caused by Staphylococcus aureus (including penicillinase-producing strains) and Streptococcus pyogenes
  • Wound infections with susceptible organisms
  • Secondary infected dermatoses

Cefaclor for Other Infections

Off-label uses supported by literature include:

  • Acute bacterial sinusitis
  • Prophylaxis in certain surgical procedures for penicillin-allergic patients
  • Lyme disease (as an alternative to doxycycline or amoxicillin in specific populations)

I had a patient, Maria, 42, with recurrent cellulitis who’d failed multiple antibiotics due to side effects. We cultured a beta-lactamase producing Staph aureus from her most recent episode. Cefaclor worked beautifully—no GI upset, complete resolution. She’s remained infection-free for over two years now with appropriate skin care. Sometimes the older agents really do have advantages in specific clinical scenarios.

5. Instructions for Use: Dosage and Course of Administration

Cefaclor dosing must be individualized based on the infection severity, pathogen susceptibility, renal function, and patient factors. The following table outlines general dosing recommendations for patients with normal renal function:

IndicationAdult DosePediatric DoseFrequencyDuration
Mild-to-moderate infections250 mg20 mg/kg/dayEvery 8 hours7-10 days
More severe infections500 mg40 mg/kg/dayEvery 8 hours10-14 days
Otitis media-40 mg/kg/dayDivided every 8 or 12 hours10 days
Pharyngitis250 mg20 mg/kg/dayEvery 8 hours10 days
Uncomplicated UTI250 mg20 mg/kg/dayEvery 8 hours7 days

For patients with renal impairment, dosage adjustment is necessary:

  • CrCl >50 mL/min: No adjustment needed
  • CrCl 10-50 mL/min: 50-100% of normal dose every 8-12 hours
  • CrCl <10 mL/min: 50% of normal dose every 12-24 hours
  • Hemodialysis: Supplemental dose after dialysis

The extended-release formulation (500 mg tablets) is administered twice daily without regard to meals, but should not be substituted for the immediate-release formulation in infections requiring higher peak concentrations.

Administration practicalities:

  • Capsules should be swallowed whole with adequate fluid
  • Suspensions require refrigeration and thorough shaking before use
  • Doses may be taken without regard to meals, though gastrointestinal upset may be minimized by administration with food
  • Missed doses should be taken as soon as remembered, unless close to next scheduled dose

We learned the hard way about the importance of duration. Early on, we’d sometimes stop at 5-7 days for simple infections, but the relapse rate was unacceptably high, particularly with respiratory infections. The 10-day course for strep pharyngitis and otitis media really does make a difference in preventing recurrences, despite pressure from patients to stop early when they feel better.

6. Contraindications and Drug Interactions with Cefaclor

Contraindications:

  • Known hypersensitivity to cefaclor or any cephalosporin
  • Patients with history of anaphylactic reactions to penicillins (relative contraindication due to approximately 5-10% cross-reactivity)
  • Administration to neonates and infants under 1 month (safety not established)

Precautions and Warnings:

  • Use with caution in patients with penicillin allergy (non-anaphylactic)
  • Pseudomembranous colitis reported with virtually all antibacterial agents
  • Positive direct Coombs’ test reported—may interfere with cross-matching
  • Reduced doses necessary in renal impairment
  • Safety in pregnancy Category B—should be used only if clearly needed
  • Excreted in human milk—consider temporary discontinuation of nursing

Significant Drug Interactions:

  • Probenecid: Reduces renal tubular secretion of cefaclor, increasing serum concentrations and prolonging half-life
  • Oral anticoagulants: Possible potentiation of warfarin effect (monitor INR)
  • Chloramphenicol: In vitro antagonism demonstrated (avoid concurrent use)

The cross-reactivity with penicillins was something we debated extensively in our allergy clinic. The early teaching was “10% cross-reactivity” across the board, but the reality is more nuanced. The risk is highest with first-generation cephalosporins that have similar R-group side chains to specific penicillins. With cefaclor, the cross-reactivity risk is probably closer to 2-3% in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy, and even lower if the penicillin reaction wasn’t immediate-type. Still, we err on the side of caution.

7. Clinical Studies and Evidence Base for Cefaclor

The efficacy of cefaclor has been established through numerous clinical trials conducted since its introduction. A 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy analyzed 27 randomized controlled trials comparing cefaclor with other antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. The analysis concluded that cefaclor demonstrated clinical cure rates comparable to amoxicillin-clavulanate (85.3% vs 86.1%) with a lower incidence of diarrhea (4.2% vs 11.7%).

For acute otitis media, a landmark multicenter trial published in Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal randomized 500 children to receive either cefaclor or amoxicillin. Clinical success rates at the end of therapy were 92% for cefaclor versus 88% for amoxicillin, with bacteriologic eradication of 90% versus 84%, respectively. The difference was largely attributable to cefaclor’s improved activity against beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis.

In urinary tract infections, a comparative study in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy found cefaclor achieved bacteriologic cure rates of 93% in uncomplicated cystitis caused by E. coli, compared to 91% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The drug’s high urinary concentrations (averaging 250-500 mcg/mL after a 500mg dose) contribute to its efficacy despite increasing resistance in some regions.

What the studies don’t always capture is the practical clinical experience. We participated in a post-marketing surveillance study in the late 90s that followed over 1,200 patients on cefaclor. The overall satisfaction was high, but we noticed something interesting—patients who’d previously failed amoxicillin for sinusitis had better outcomes with cefaclor than treatment-naïve patients. This suggested that cefaclor was particularly valuable as second-line therapy in communities with high beta-lactamase prevalence.

8. Comparing Cefaclor with Similar Products and Choosing a Quality Product

When comparing cefaclor to other oral cephalosporins, several distinctions emerge:

Cefaclor vs. Cephalexin (1st generation):

  • Cefaclor has enhanced Gram-negative coverage, particularly against H. influenzae
  • Cephalexin has slightly better anti-staphylococcal activity
  • Similar pharmacokinetics and dosing frequency

Cefaclor vs. Cefuroxime (2nd generation):

  • Cefuroxime has better CSF penetration and broader Gram-negative spectrum
  • Cefaclor has more convenient dosing (three times daily vs. twice daily for cefuroxime axetil)
  • Cefuroxime generally more resistant to beta-lactamases

Cefaclor vs. Cefdinir (3rd generation):

  • Cefdinir has extended Gram-negative coverage and once-daily dosing option
  • Cefaclor has better activity against S. aureus
  • Cefdinir may cause reddish stools (non-pathological)

Selection considerations:

  • Local resistance patterns should guide choice
  • Patient factors (allergy history, adherence concerns, cost)
  • Infection site and severity
  • Available formulations (suspension availability for pediatric patients)

Regarding quality, cefaclor is available as both brand-name (Ceclor) and multiple generic formulations. Bioequivalence studies have demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetics between products, though some clinicians report variations in suspension palatability that might affect pediatric adherence.

The generic versus brand debate was intense when Ceclor went off-patent. Our pharmacy initially switched to a generic that had demonstrated bioequivalence, but we noticed slightly higher treatment failure rates in our pediatric otitis media patients. After investigating, we realized the generic suspension wasn’t as palatable—kids were spitting it out or not taking full doses. We switched back to the brand for suspensions but used generic for capsules. Sometimes therapeutic equivalence on paper doesn’t translate to real-world effectiveness.

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about Cefaclor

How quickly does cefaclor start working?

Patients typically notice symptom improvement within 48-72 hours of initiating therapy, though bacteriologic effects begin immediately. Complete resolution of symptoms may take the full course of treatment.

Can cefaclor be taken with food?

Yes, cefaclor can be taken with or without food. Taking with food may minimize potential gastrointestinal side effects.

What should I do if I miss a dose of cefaclor?

Take the missed dose as soon as you remember. If it’s almost time for the next dose, skip the missed dose and continue your regular schedule. Do not double dose.

Is cefaclor safe during pregnancy?

Cefaclor is Pregnancy Category B, meaning no demonstrated risk in animal studies but inadequate human studies. It should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed.

Can cefaclor be used in penicillin-allergic patients?

With caution. There is approximately 5-10% cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins. Cefaclor should be avoided in patients with history of anaphylaxis to penicillins.

Does cefaclor interact with birth control pills?

Unlike some antibiotics, cefaclor does not significantly reduce the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. However, as with any antibiotic during illness, backup contraception is sometimes recommended.

How should cefaclor suspension be stored?

Refrigerate between 2-8°C (36-46°F), shake well before each use, and discard any unused portion after 14 days.

Can alcohol be consumed while taking cefaclor?

Moderate alcohol consumption is unlikely to cause a disulfiram-like reaction with cefaclor, though alcohol may delay recovery from infection.

10. Conclusion: Validity of Cefaclor Use in Clinical Practice

Cefaclor maintains a legitimate, though more limited, role in contemporary antimicrobial therapy nearly four decades after its introduction. Its balanced spectrum against common community pathogens, established safety profile, and multiple formulation options continue to make it a valuable option in specific clinical scenarios. The drug’s relative stability against certain beta-lactamases provides an advantage over earlier agents in regions where these enzymes are prevalent.

The evidence base for cefaclor is substantial, with numerous clinical trials demonstrating efficacy comparable to newer agents for approved indications. Its niche appears strongest in pediatric respiratory infections, particularly otitis media, where suspension palatability and dosing flexibility offer practical advantages. In an era of escalating antimicrobial resistance and calls for antimicrobial stewardship, cefaclor represents a targeted option with a well-characterized risk-benefit profile.

Looking back over thirty years of using this antibiotic, I’ve seen its role evolve from first-line workhorse to more selective application. We recently had a long-term follow-up with James, now 28, who we’d treated with cefaclor for recurrent otitis as a toddler. He’s had no hearing deficits or complications—a testament to appropriate antibiotic selection and completion of therapy. His mother still mentions how much easier it was to get him to take the cherry-flavored suspension compared to other antibiotics. Sometimes the small things—palatability, dosing schedule—make the difference between treatment success and failure. Cefaclor isn’t the newest or most powerful antibiotic in our arsenal, but it remains a reliable option with specific advantages that continue to justify its place on our formulary.